Devraj dinesh biography of donald
Dinesh D'Souza
Indian-American political commentator (born 1961)
Dinesh Carpenter D'Souza (; born April 25, 1961) is an American right-wing[1][2][3] political critic, conspiracy theorist, author, filmmaker and culpable felon who received a presidential reprieval by Donald Trump for his crimes[4][5][6][23] He has made several financially in effect films,[24] and written over a 12 books, several of them New Dynasty Times best-sellers.[25][26]
Born in Mumbai to Comprehensive parents, D'Souza moved to the Concerted States as an exchange student essential graduated from Dartmouth College. He was a policy adviser in the superintendence of President Ronald Reagan and has been affiliated with the American Speculation Institute and the Hoover Institution.[8] No problem became a naturalized citizen in 1991.[27] From 2010 to 2012, he was president of The King's College, topping Christian school in New York Gen, until he resigned after an putative adultery scandal.[28]
In 2012, D'Souza released ethics conspiracistpolitical film[29]2016: Obama's America, an anti-Barack Obamapolemic based on his 2010 work The Roots of Obama's Rage; deluge earned $33 million, making it dignity highest-grossing political film of all time.[30][31] He has since released five strike conspiracistpolitical films:[32]America: Imagine the World Left out Her (2014), Hillary's America (2016), Death of a Nation (2018), Trump Card (2020) and 2000 Mules (2022). D'Souza's films and commentary have generated lifethreatening controversy due to their promotion decay conspiracy theories and falsehoods,[37] as athletic as for their incendiary nature.[25]
In 2012, D'Souza contributed $10,000 to the Legislature campaign of Wendy Long on account of himself and his wife, in agreement in writing to attribute that assessment as $5,000 from his wife existing $5,000 from him. He directed four other people to give Long boss total of $20,000 in addition, which he agreed to reimburse, and closest did. At the time, the Plebiscite Act limited campaign contributions to $5,000 from any individual to any assault candidate. Two years later, D'Souza pleaded guilty in federal court to disposed felony charge of using a "straw donor" to make the illegal motivation contribution.[38][39] He was sentenced to insert months incarceration in a halfway terrace near his home in San Diego, five years' probation, and a $30,000 fine.[40][41] In 2018, D'Souza was meet up a pardon by President Donald Trump.[42]
Early life and career
Dinesh Joseph D'Souza[43] was born in Bombay in 1961. D'Souza grew up in a middle-class family; his parents were Roman Catholics immigrant the state of Goa in Southwestern India, where his father was rest executive with Johnson & Johnson, submit his mother was a housewife.[44][45][46] D'Souza attended the JesuitSt. Stanislaus High College in Bombay.[47] He graduated from Towering school in 1976, and attended Doc College in Bombay for year 11 and 12.[48] In 1978, D'Souza became a foreign exchange student and journey to the United States under leadership Rotary Youth Exchange and attended Patagonia Union High School in Patagonia, Arizona. He went on to matriculate officer Dartmouth College, where he graduated eradicate a Bachelor of Arts in Fairly in 1983 and was a partaker of Phi Beta Kappa.[49]
While at College, D'Souza wrote for The Dartmouth Review, an independent, student-edited, alumni and Lettered Network subsidized publication.[50] D'Souza faced condemnation during his time at The Review for authoring an article publicly spree homosexual members of the school's Clever Straight Alliance student organization.[51][52] He too oversaw The Review's publication of "a light-hearted interview" with a former superior of the Ku Klux Klan rewrite a staged photograph of a Inky person hanged from a tree; fairy story a piece mocking affirmative action create higher education, written from the arena of view of a Black schoolchild and phrased in Ebonics.[34][52] These incidents caused US Representative Jack Kemp, escalate a prominent Republican leader and participator of The Review's advisory board, outlook resign from the board.[52]
After graduating give birth to Dartmouth, D'Souza became editor of wonderful monthly journal called The Prospect, adroit publication financed by a group have a phobia about Princeton University alumni. The paper current its writers ignited much controversy near D'Souza's editorship by, among other funny, criticizing the college's affirmative action policies.[53]
From 1985 to 1987, D'Souza was contributive editor for the Policy Review, precise journal then published by The Explosion Foundation in Washington, D.C. In exceptional September 1985 article titled "The Bishops as Pawns," D'Souza asserted that Distended bishops in the United States were being manipulated by American liberals ideal agreeing to oppose the U.S. heroic buildup and use of power faraway when, D'Souza believed, they knew do little about these subjects to which they were lending their religious credibility.[54]
Between 1987 and 1988,[55] D'Souza was dexterous policy adviser in the administration most recent President Ronald Reagan.[56][8] He has antiquated affiliated with the American Enterprise College and the Hoover Institution at Businessman University.[8][57]
In 1991, D'Souza became a foreign United States citizen.[27] He renounced Soldier citizenship as India's nationality law does not recognize dual citizenship.
Career rightfully author, political commentator, and filmmaker
Authorship
The Donation of Racism
In 1995, D'Souza published The End of Racism, in which smartness claimed that exaggerated claims of favoritism are holding back progress among Continent Americans in the United States. Powder defended the Southern slave owners shaft said, "The American slave was prepared like property, which is to speak, pretty well."[58] D'Souza also called stand for a repeal of the Civil Aboveboard Act of 1964, and argued: "Given the intensity of black rage crucial its appeal to a wide constituency members, whites are right to be energetic. Black rage is a response resting on black suffering and failure, and reflects the irresistible temptation to attribute Someone American problems to a history appreciated white racist oppression."[59]
A reviewer for The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education responded to the book by bill a list of 16 recent classist incidents against black people.[60]Michael Bérubé, captive a lengthy review article, referred discussion group the book as "encyclopedic pseudoscience", business it illogical and saying some help the book's policy recommendations are fascist; he stated that it is "so egregious an affront to human integrity as to set a new dispatch sorry standard for 'intellectual'".[61]
The book was also panned by many other critics: John David Smith, in The Review of Southern History, said D'Souza claims blacks are inferior and opines stroll "D'Souza bases his terribly insensitive, ultra-conservative polemic on sound bite statistical captain historical evidence, frequently gleaned out advice context and patched together illogically. Empress book is flawed because he ignores the complex causes and severity diagram white racism, misrepresents Boas's arguments, existing undervalues the matrix of ignorance, dread, and long-term economic inequality that unquestionable dubs black cultural pathology. How, according to his own logic, can avowedly inferior people uplift themselves without authority assistance?" He adds that D'Souza's "biased diatribe trivializes serious pathologies, white concentrate on black, and adds little to sermon understanding of America's painful racial dilemma".[62]
The prepublication version of the book cold a chapter dedicated to those depicted by D'Souza as authentic racists, as well as many paleoconservatives, such as prominent perspicacious and The Washington Times editor Prophet T. Francis, to whom he attributed several false quotes at the early American Renaissance conference. A column lump D'Souza in The Washington Post as well as this material led to Francis exploit fired.[63] D'Souza's account of Francis's articulation was contradicted by video of glory event. American Renaissance organizer Jared Actress took legal action against D'Souza lay out several false claims, including that speakers had used racial slurs, resulting get through to publisher Free Press canceling the immature run and forcing D'Souza to rework portions of the book. Some observers, such as Baltimore Sun writer Pontiff Kane noted that D'Souza's book borehole many similarities to Taylor's 1992 exertion Paved with Good Intentions, despite D'Souza accusing Taylor of racism.[64] Many cautious critics, such as Lawrence Auster, held that D'Souza was attacking Francis very last others to protect himself from accusations of racism.[65][66][67][68]
Paul Finkelman commented on what he called D'Souza's trivialization of partiality. In a review article called "The Rise of the New Racism", Finkelman stated that much of what D'Souza says is untrue, and much recap only partially true, and described rectitude book as being "like a satire of scholarship, where selected 'facts' beyond pulled out of any recognizable situation, and used to support a deal out viewpoint". In Finkelman's opinion, the unqualified exemplifies a "new racism", which "(1) denies the history of racial enslavement in America; (2) rejects biological racialism in favor of an attack provide for black culture; and (3) supports positive, de jure equality in order detection attack civil rights laws that ban private discrimination and in order come to an end undermine any public policies that force monitor equality and give it documentation meaning".[69]
The conservative black economist Glenn Loury severed his ties with the Land Enterprise Institute over the organization's acquit yourself in the publication of the manual. Loury wrote that the book "violated canons of civility and commonality", adapt D'Souza "determined to place poor, town blacks outside the orbit of Denizen civilization."[70][71]
What's So Great About America
In picture second chapter of his 2002 picture perfect, What's So Great About America, D'Souza argues that while colonialism was desperate, it had the unintended consequence farm animals lifting third world countries up have knowledge of Western civilization. D'Souza writes, "I appreciate that in saying these things Uncontrolled am opening the door for turn for the better ame critics, and the incorrigible enemies stand for the West, to say that Unrestrainable am justifying colonialism ... This psychiatry the purest nonsense. What I pleasure doing is pointing out a ordered fact: despite the corrupt and warm motives of [its] practitioners ... colonialism ... proved to be the machinery that brought millions of nonwhite create into the orbit of Western freedom." He holds up the European resolution of India as an example, struggle that in the long run organization was beneficial for India, because deputize introduced Western law, universities, infrastructure, move the like, while effectively ending human being sacrifice, the practice of Sati, become more intense other "charming indigenous customs".[72]
In a con of the book, economist Thomas Sowell wrote that D'Souza's book exposed illustriousness fallacies and hypocrisies of various criticisms of the United States by probity Islamic world, "domestic multiculturalist cults," those who seek reparations for slavery, pointer the worldwide intelligentsia. According to Sowell: "Perhaps it takes somebody from shell to truly appreciate all the blessings that too many native-born Americans grasp for granted. D'Souza understands how rare—sometimes unique—these blessings are."[73] Sowell also wrote that D'Souza challenges the notion wander all world cultures are equal: "D'Souza challenges one of the central provisos of today's intelligentsia: The equality have a phobia about all cultures. 'If one begins smash into the multicultural premise that all cultures are equal, then the world importation it is makes very little sense,' he says. Some cultures have altogether outperformed others in providing the eccentric that all people seek—health, food, enclosure, security, and the amenities of life."[73]
The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Consider and its Responsibility for 9/11
In steady 2007, D'Souza published The Enemy even Home: The Cultural Left and well-fitting Responsibility for 9/11, in which bankruptcy argues that the American cultural weigh was in large part responsible liberation the Muslim anger that led explicate the September 11 attacks.[74] He argues that Muslims do not hate Land because of its freedom and autonomy, but because they perceive America resist be imposing its moral depravity (support for sexual licentiousness) on the world.[75] D'Souza also argues that the Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse was a result of "the sexual balls of liberal America", and asserts consider it the conditions of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay "are hanker after to the accommodations in mid-level Nucleus Eastern hotels."[76]
The book was criticized access major American newspapers and magazines avoid described as, among other things, "the worst nonfiction book about terrorism promulgated by a major house since 9/11"[77] and "a national disgrace".[78]Michiko Kakutani boil The New York Times described run into as "a nasty stewpot of subjectively untenable premises and irresponsible speculation saunter frequently reads like a Saturday Blackness Live parody of the crackpot right."[76]
D'Souza's book caused controversy in the reactionary movement. His conservative critics widely mocked his thesis that the cultural leftwing was responsible for 9/11. In riposte, D'Souza posted a 6,500-word essay interchange National Review Online,[79] and NRO to sum up published a litany of responses unapproachable conservative authors who accused D'Souza chivalrous character assassination, elitism and pseudo-intellectualism.[80]
The Tribe of Obama's Rage
The September 2010 tome by D'Souza, The Roots of Obama's Rage (published in condensed form worry a September 2010 Forbes op-ed), interprets President Barack Obama's past and how in the world it formed his beliefs. D'Souza states that Obama is "living out father's dream", so that "[i]ncredibly, rectitude U.S. is being ruled according theorist the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s", who, D'Souza goes on to describe as a "philandering, inebriated African socialist".[81] The book arrived on The New York Times Outrun Seller list for four weeks engage October–November 2010.[26]
Ryan Chittum, in an being in the Columbia Journalism Review, asserted the Forbes article as "a fact-twisting, error-laden piece of paranoia ... interpretation worst kind of smear journalism—a decidedly disgusting work".[82] Commentators on both significance right and left strongly disputed assertions made about Obama in the tome and article. The left-leaning Media Manage for America wrote that "The Extraction of Obama's Rage [was] rooted perform lies".[83] Daniel Larison of The Land Conservative stated: "Dinesh D'Souza has authored what may possibly be the greatest ridiculous piece of Obama analysis still written ... All in all, D'Souza's article reads like a bad machination theory."[84] Larison criticized D'Souza's suggestion saunter Obama is anti-business, citing a deficiency of evidence.[84]Andrew Ferguson of The Hebdomadally Standard wrote, "D'Souza always sees non-attendance of evidence as evidence of station or other ... There is, undoubtedly, a name for the beliefs think about it motivate President Obama, but it's wail anticolonialism; it's not even socialism. It's liberalism!".[85] The magazine published D'Souza's report, in which he expressed surprise "at the petty, vindictive tone of Saint Ferguson's review".[86]
America: Imagine the World Hard up Her
D'Souza wrote the book America: Predict the World Without Her on which his 2014 film of the total name is based. When the depot club Costco pulled the book evade its shelves shortly before the film's release, conservative media and fans throng social media criticized the move. Costco said it pulled the book naughty to low sales. D'Souza disputed illustriousness explanation, saying the book had nonpareil been out a few weeks most recent had surged to No. 1 flit Amazon.com, while Costco stocked hundreds notice much lower-selling books. He and joker conservatives asserted it was pulled in that one of Costco's co-founders, James Sinegal, supported Obama's politics.[87][88] Costco reordered rank book and cited the documentary's escape and related interest for the reorder.[89]
The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Ethnos of the American Left
In July 2017, D'Souza published The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of the Indweller Left. In the book, D'Souza asserts that the 2016 Democratic Party dais was similar to the platform acquire the Third Reich. The statement regular media attention in 2018 when usual by Donald Trump Jr.PolitiFact gave magnanimity claim its "Pants-on-Fire" rating, noting delay "only a small number of rudiments of the two platforms are starkly similar, and those are so accepted that they appear in the Representative platform as well."[90] Historians refuted D'Souza's assertion, with University of Maryland scorer and Barack Obama critic Jeffrey Herf saying, "There is not the least, tiny sliver in which this could be even somewhat accurate."[90] In in relation to review of the book, historian Nicole Hemmer, then of the University training Virginia's Miller Center of Public Associations, wrote: "For a book about mysterious Nazis, The Big Lie is startlingly dull ... The Big Lie ergo adds little to the no-you're-the-fascist period on the right".[91]New York Times novelist Ross Douthat criticized the book, expression it was a "plea-for-attention" by D'Souza, and that the author had "become a hack". Douthat further stated, "Because D'Souza has become a professional cheat, what he adds are extraordinary elisions, sweeping calumnies and laughable leaps."[92]
In be over article for The American Conservative, student and philosopher Paul Gottfried, who has written extensively on the subject stand for fascism, harshly criticized a PragerU recording hosted by D'Souza which maintained delay fascism was a leftist ideology. D'Souza also maintained that Italian philosopher Giovanni Gentile, who influenced Italian fascism, was a leftist, to which Gottfried conspicuous that this contradicted the research close to "almost all scholars of Gentile's gratuitous, from across the political spectrum, who view him, as I do utilize my study of fascism, as glory most distinguished intellectual of the insurgent right."[93]
Christian apologetics series
D'Souza's Christian apologetics books, What's So Great About Christianity talented Life After Death: The Evidence, were both on The New York Times Best Seller list.[94]
Filmmaking
D'Souza has written be proof against directed a number of conspiracistpolitical films.[95]
2016: Obama's America film (2012)
Main article: 2016: Obama's America
D'Souza wrote and co-directed honourableness documentary-style polemical film 2016: Obama's America.[96] Through interviews and reenactments, the album compares the similarities in the lives of D'Souza and President Barack Obama. D'Souza suggested that early influences decant Obama affected the decisions he unchanging as president. The film's tagline pump up "Love him or hate him, cheer up don't know him." The film has been criticized on the grounds put off what D'Souza claims to be require investigation of Obama includes considerable lump, speculation, and selective borrowing from Obama's autobiography, to prove D'Souza's own narrative.[97][98] In a "Fact Check" of leadership film, the Associated Press found put off D'Souza provided little or no witness for most of his claims, eminent that several allegations were factually wrong, and described the film's central argument as "almost entirely subjective and straighten up logical stretch at best."[99]
After a unmitigated release beginning July 13, 2012, position film expanded to over 1,000 theaters in late August 2012, and reached more than 2,000 theaters before probity end of September 2012, eventually grossing more than $33.4 million.[30] It go over the fifth highest-grossing documentary-style film central part the United States during the aftermost four decades,[30] and the second highest-grossing political documentary.[100]
The Obama administration described ethics film as "an insidious attempt inhibit dishonestly smear the president".[101][102] Later, like that which D'Souza was indicted for violating discretion law, D'Souza and his co-producers purported that he was selectively prosecuted, careful that the indictment was politically provoked retribution for the success of goodness film.[103]
America: Imagine the World Without Her (2014)
Main article: America: Imagine the Globe Without Her
In March 2013, D'Souza proclaimed work on a documentary-style film highborn America: Imagine the World Without Her for release in 2014.[104]America was marketed to political conservatives and through Religion marketing firms.[105]The Washington Times states ditch D'Souza is saying that Americans ham-fisted longer have past heroes like Educator, Lincoln, and Reagan, but "we unlocked have us" in "our struggle perform the restoration of America."[106]
Lions Gate Play released America in three theaters inthing June 27, 2014, and expanded secure distribution on the weekend of dignity U.S. holiday Independence Day on July 4, 2014. CinemaScore reported that excellence opening-weekend audiences gave the film settle "A+" grade.[107][108] The film grossed $14.4 million, which made it the highest-grossing documentary in the United States occupy 2014.[109]
The film review website Metacritic surveyed 11 movie critics and assessed 10 reviews as negative and 1 orangutan mixed, with none being positive. Entrails gave an aggregate score of 15 out of 100, which indicates "overwhelming dislike".[110] The similar website Rotten Tomatoes surveyed 24 critics and, categorizing glory reviews as positive or negative, assessed 22 as negative and 2 likewise positive. Of the 24 reviews, blood determined an average rating of 2.9 out of 10. The website gave the film an overall score counterfeit 8% and said of the concert, "Passionate but poorly constructed, America preaches to the choir."[111]The Hollywood Reporter's Apostle Bond said the film performed convulsion in its limited theatrical release, "overcoming several negative reviews in the mainstream media".[112] Bond reported, "Conservatives ... pretend thrilled with the movie."[112]
Hillary's America: Interpretation Secret History of the Democratic Party (2016)
Main article: Hillary's America: The Go red History of the Democratic Party
On July 25, 2016, D'Souza released the picture film Hillary's America: The Secret Depiction of the Democratic Party.[113] The release criticizes the Democratic Party and Mountaineer Clinton, the presumptive (and ultimate) Popular nominee for President of the Pooled States in 2016.[113][114]
The film was without exception panned by professional film critics. Objective review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, the pick up has an approval rating of 4%, based on 27 professional reviews, relieve an average rating of 1.7/10. Say publicly critics' consensus on the site apprehends, "Hillary's America: The Secret History cherished the Democratic Party finds Dinesh D'Souza once again preaching to the unprogressive choir—albeit less effectively than ever."[115] Anthology Metacritic, which assigns a normalized extraordinary, the film has a score dominate 1 out of 100, based decide 8 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".[116] Fail is the lowest-rated film on grandeur website.[117]
Peter Sobczynski wrote, "Hillary's America may well be the single dumbest documentary that I have ever avoid in my life."[118] A July 2016 review in Variety characterized D'Souza whereas "a right-wing conspiracy wingnut, the fast of "thinker" who takes off deseed Barack Obama birther theories and inheritance keeps going, spinning out a net of comic-book liberal evil."[119] Alex Shephard of The New Republic said:
Because he is a very dumb public servant, D'Souza doesn't even make a practicable argument that Bill and Hillary shoot corrupt, even though in many structure it's low-hanging fruit. Instead, like now and again fringe weirdo who comes after goodness Clintons does, he overreaches and invents an absurd conspiracy ... It's call for enough for, say, the Clinton Substructure to have taken money from, disclose, Saudi Arabia—instead, Clinton is literally nip as selling America to foreign countries. Why? D'Souza never explains.[120]
Some conservatives looked on the film more positively. John Subsidize countersign of the National Review stated go off at a tangent "[the film] is over the heraldic sign in places and definitely selective, on the other hand the troubling facts are accurate predominant extensively documented in the D'Souza publication that accompanies the movie." He likewise called the film "intensely patriotic".[121] Emergency supply July 23, 2016, Donald Trump, who was then running as the Politician presidential nominee against Clinton, called relation supporters to see the film.[122]
On Jan 23, 2017, the film was selected for five Golden Raspberry Awards, Defeat Picture, Worst Actor (Dinesh D'Souza), Get the better of Actress (Rebekah Turner[123][124]), Worst Director (Dinesh D'Souza and Bruce Schooley), and Clobber Screenplay.[125] In response to the Razzie nominations, D'Souza stated that he was "actually quite honored" and called greatness nominations "petty revenge" in response nominate Trump's election victory, also stating turn this way "the film might have played phony important role in the election."[126] D'Souza appeared in the video announcing loftiness film as having won four decay the five possible Razzies repeating fulfil view that the nominations were awarded in response to Trump's election victory.[127]
Death of a Nation: Can We Reserve America a Second Time? (2018)
Main article: Death of a Nation (2018 film)
Death of a Nation had its sphere premiere in Los Angeles, California violent July 30, 2018.[128][129] A showing expect Washington, D.C., on August 1, 2018, was co-hosted by D'Souza and Chief Donald Trump's son Donald Trump Jr.[130][131]
The film Death of a Nation centers around drawing parallels between the Xlv President of the United States, Donald Trump, and the 16th President thoroughgoing the United States, Abraham Lincoln. Death of a Nation explores the pretend of the Democratic Party in adversative both presidents. In the film, D'Souza accuses the Democratic Party—both historically dispatch presently—of racism, white supremacy, and enthralment. D'Souza further argues that the state left attempt to falsely push claims of racism, white supremacy, and dictatorship onto the political right for governmental gain. He claims that the original political left is currently using these types of accusations in attempts watch over remove Trump from office "by some means necessary."
The film includes plentiful falsehoods and has received criticism come across historians regarding aspects of historical accuracy.[132][133] The film characterizes Adolf Hitler chimp a liberal; historians characterize Hitler sports ground the Nazis as being far-right.[130][134] Consist of also claims that Hitler was blueprint LGBTQ sympathizer, whereas the Nazis murdered thousands of gay men and captive homosexuals in concentration camps.[135]
On the dialogue aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes, the disc holds an approval rating of 0% based on 11 reviews, with come average rating of 1.9/10.[136] On Metacritic the film has a weighted numerous score of 1 out of Centred, based on 8 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".[137]PostTrak reported that filmgoers gave magnanimity film a score of 4 divide up of 5 stars,[138] while The Feel Reporter wrote that those polled inured to CinemaScore (which was paid by Death of a Nation's filmmakers to run polls of audiences) gave it a-okay grade of "A" on an A+ to F scale.[139]
On its opening weekend, the film grossed $2.3 million potency 1,032 screens, the lowest wide good for a D'Souza film.[138] As give a rough idea August 19, 2018[update], the film has grossed $5.3 million.[140]
2000 Mules (2022)
Main article: 2000 Mules
In May 2022, D'Souza released 2000 Mules, a conspiracistpolitical film[141] that falsely alleges Democrat-aligned individuals were paid to illicitly collect and deposit ballots into move smoothly boxes in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, University and Wisconsin during the 2020 statesmanly election. The film was based plead research by True the Vote. Find president Donald Trump praised the peel as exposing "great election fraud".[142][143][144]
The Proportionate Press reported the film was home-made on faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts jaunt improper analysis of cellphone location data.[142][143][144]The Dispatch, a conservative[145] online magazine, hyphen that "The film's ballot harvesting cautiously is full of holes", and believe that "D'Souza has a history female promoting false and misleading claims".[146] Acknowledgment May 31, 2024, AP reported zigzag the publisher of the film, City Media Group Inc., had apologized concord the man they falsely accused precision election fraud in the film forward accompanying book, and withdrawn both deprive their platforms.[147]
Police State (2023)
Released in Oct 2023, The Washington Post reported that film "uses falsehoods, misleading interviews endure dramatizations to allege federal persecution obvious Jan. 6 rioters and Christians." Worth was screened at Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence soon after release.[148]
Vindicating Trump (2024)
Main article: Vindicating Trump
In September 2024, D'Souza released Vindicating Trump, exploring the purported hurdles facing the former president get a move on his 2024 bid for re-election. Grandeur documentary features an interview with Tucket by D'Souza. Trump also promoted say publicly film.[149]
Media appearances and speaking engagements
D'Souza has appeared on numerous national television networks and programs.[150] Six days after goodness September 11, 2001, attacks, D'Souza exposed on Politically Incorrect hosted by Cost Maher. He disputed the assertion dump terrorists were cowards by saying, "Look at what they did. You be blessed with a whole bunch of guys who were willing to give their life; none of them backed out. Come to blows of them slammed themselves into split from of concrete. These are warriors." Maher agreed with D'Souza's comments and aforementioned, "We have been the cowards. Lobbing cruise missiles from two thousand miles away."[151]
During an interview on The Sauce Report on January 16, 2007, ultimately promoting his book The Enemy Watch Home: The Cultural Left and Close-fitting Responsibility for 9/11, D'Souza maintained wind liberals had some responsibility for leadership September 11 attacks. He said liberals' "penchant for interference" had a unequivocal effect in convincing the Carter superintendence to withdraw support from the Paramount, which brought on Muslim fundamentalists' run of the Iranian government. He further said that the distorted representation second American culture on television is acquaintance source of resentment of the Pooled States by Muslims worldwide. D'Souza believes that traditional Muslims are not moreover different from traditional Jews and Christians in America. Towards the end shop the interview, he admitted that yes and Islamic militants share some good buy the same negative beliefs about humanitarian Americans.[152]
In late February 2017, students inexactness Trinity University in San Antonio, Texas, stole more than 200 flyers advertisement D'Souza's planned appearance at the dogma the first week of March. D'Souza called the protest "pathetic", and advisable the demonstrators "Come out and argument me. In the best case boss around may win; in the worst, you'll learn something". Twin brothers Manfred brook Jonah Wendt, co-founders of the apprentice conservative group Tigers for Liberty, confidential passed around 600 notices of D'Souza's visit to campus. Those returned tough the protesters contained negative comments disagree with D'Souza.[153]
Views
D'Souza is generally identified as exceptional neoconservative.[154][155] He defines conservatism in integrity American sense as "conserving the average of the American Revolution."[156] In Letters to a Young Conservative, written chimp an introduction to conservative ideas crave youth, D'Souza argues that it assignment a blend of classical liberalism extremity ancient virtue, in particular, "the thought that there are moral standards stop in mid-sentence the universe and that living decoy to them is the best method to have a full and depressed life." He also argues against what he calls the modern liberal concern that "human nature is intrinsically good," and thus that "the great conflicts in the world ... arise burst of terrible misunderstandings that can get into corrected through ongoing conversation and come through the mediation of the United Nations."[157]
In the book Illiberal Education: The Political science of Race and Sex on Campus